Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

Hydrogen Charging Of Armco Iron And L80 Steel In Various Electrolytes

Picture for Hydrogen Charging Of Armco Iron And L80 Steel In Various Electrolytes
Available for download

Facing the increasing industrial requirements on iron and steel products the importance of investigating hydrogen embrittlement has been rising straightly since Johnson first described the influence of hydrogen on the mechanical properties of iron and steel in 1874⁠. Since this day a lot of effort has been done on understanding and describing the mechanism of hydrogen embrittlement and how absorbed hydrogen performs in materials.

Product Number: 51322-17604-SG
Author: M. Eichinger, M. Truschner, D. Zwittnig, A. Trautmann, G. Mori
Publication Date: 2022
Industries: Corrosion Monitoring and Control , Coatings and Linings , Coatings
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

Armco iron and L80 steel (according to API 5CT) were charged under various conditions due to the lack of knowledge of the amount of hydrogen, which is absorbed during operation and laboratory charging. These two materials were charged in sodium chloride (NaCl), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), both with and without addition of thiourea (CH4N2S) and in H2S (NACE TM0177) at open circuit potential. Additionally, cathodic charging was done in sodium chloride and sulfuric acid, both with thiourea added at a current density of 1 mA/cm2. The charging time was between 2 and 200 hours for both methods. Most of the immersion tests at open circuit potential resulted in hydrogen concentrations of up to 1 wt. ppm, while cathodic loading led to values of up to 4 wt. ppm. In addition, the NACE TM0177 test provided the highest hydrogen concentrations and was the only test to show higher hydrogen concentrations for the Armco iron than for the L80 steel.

Armco iron and L80 steel (according to API 5CT) were charged under various conditions due to the lack of knowledge of the amount of hydrogen, which is absorbed during operation and laboratory charging. These two materials were charged in sodium chloride (NaCl), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), both with and without addition of thiourea (CH4N2S) and in H2S (NACE TM0177) at open circuit potential. Additionally, cathodic charging was done in sodium chloride and sulfuric acid, both with thiourea added at a current density of 1 mA/cm2. The charging time was between 2 and 200 hours for both methods. Most of the immersion tests at open circuit potential resulted in hydrogen concentrations of up to 1 wt. ppm, while cathodic loading led to values of up to 4 wt. ppm. In addition, the NACE TM0177 test provided the highest hydrogen concentrations and was the only test to show higher hydrogen concentrations for the Armco iron than for the L80 steel.

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for Guidance For Thermal Stability Of Common Oilfield Chemicals
Available for download

Guidance For Thermal Stability Of Common Oilfield Chemicals

Product Number: 51322-17745-SG
Author: Tracey Jackson, Johnathon Brooks, Zhengwei Liu, Sunder Ramachandran
Publication Date: 2022
$20.00

As oilfield technologies have advanced, they have made high temperature (HT) reservoirs more accessible. HTs make the application of chemical more difficult because chemical instability at HT restricts what intermediates will work in these environments and the safety and complexity of HT testing further adds to the challenge.
Picture for Horizontal Directional Drilling In External Pipeline Coating Integrity
Available for download

Horizontal Directional Drilling In External Pipeline Coating Integrity

Product Number: 51322-17785-SG
Author: Eric Pintueles
Publication Date: 2022
$20.00

The purpose of the “Bore Test” is to know the external quality of the coating after the installation of the pipe section, as picture 1. NACE standard “TM-102-2002-SG”1a defines four kinds of coating quality such as: excellent, good, fair and poor. To know the final quality of coating with this procedure. It was used two different electrical tests. DC current test using minimum voltage drop method and, the 3 pole test which is called by the same manufacture of the Multifunction Ground Resistance tester.
How The Right Pot Choice And System Set Up Can Improve Blasting Efficiency Continued
Available for download

How The Right Pot Choice And System Set Up Can Improve Blasting Efficiency Continued

Product Number: 51322-17932-SG
Author: David J Barnes
Publication Date: 2022
$20.00

The paper written in 2019 concluded the following; Whilst we may think that all blast pots are the same, these tests show that not to be the case. The design of the pipework, remote control valves and media valves all contribute to the efficiency of the pot. The ability to precisely control the amount of grit being introduced into the airstream gives the operator much more control over grit usage and therefore overall efficiency and hence cost. 
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support