Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.
During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.
Use GIVING24 at checkout to save 20% on eCourses and books (some exclusions apply)!
Corrosion behavior of native naphthenic acids in two VGO fractions are compared with white oil solutions of the acids isolated from them by solid phase extraction (SPE). Tests are per the in-house “pretreatment-challenge” protocol on carbon steel and 5Cr steel samples.
Opportunity crudes frequently have increased acidity, making high temperature naphthenic acid (NAP) corrosion a key concern for their processing in refineries. Lab corrosion rates are hard to interpret due to either variable composition of crude fractions or the use of commercially available model carboxylic acids that may be unrepresentative of NAP species present in vacuum gas oils (VGO). Here, the corrosion behavior of native naphthenic acids in two VGO fractions are compared with white oil solutions of the acids isolated from them by solid phase extraction (SPE). Corrosion tests are conducted per the in-house “pretreatment-challenge” protocol on carbon steel and 5Cr steel samples. Corrosion rates for isolated acid solutions in mineral oil are lower than those for the corresponding VGO. Corrosion product scales formed by the isolated acids are more resistant than VGO to a high severity acid-only challenge. Characterization of corrosion product scales by cross-section electron microscopy techniques confirm that the isolated acids generate dense oxide-rich layers under thin iron sulfide (FeS) layers, in contrast to the oxide layers observed under thicker sulfide layers for the VGO. The resistance of the oxide layers to the acid challenge is consistent with previously reported formation of nano-particulate magnetite (Fe₃O₄).
Key words: Naphthenic acids, solid phase extraction, magnetite, NAP extraction, sulfidation
A comprehensive corrosion investigation of a pipeline made of UNS N04400. Samples of the failed pipeline were obtained for investigation. The study concludes that the failure can be attributed to acidic corrosion that formed inside the pipeline.
We are unable to complete this action. Please try again at a later time.
If this error continues to occur, please contact AMPP Customer Support for assistance.
Error Message:
Please login to use Standards Credits*
* AMPP Members receive Standards Credits in order to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store
You are not a Member.
AMPP Members enjoy many benefits, including Standards Credits which can be used to redeem eligible Standards and Reports in the Store.
You can visit the Membership Page to learn about the benefits of membership.
You have previously purchased this item.
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store profile to find this item.
You do not have sufficient Standards Credits to claim this item.
Click on 'ADD TO CART' to purchase this item.
Your Standards Credit(s)
1
Remaining Credits
0
Please review your transaction.
Click on 'REDEEM' to use your Standards Credits to claim this item.
You have successfully redeemed:
Go to Downloadable Products in your AMPP Store Profile to find and download this item.
Degradation mechanisms experienced by a refinery’s RFCC catalyst cooler aeration piping system. Analysis of the most recent and a past failure determined the metallurgical and mechanical degradation mechanism(s) that led to these failures.
In Oil and Gas plant facilities, protective coating system selection is important. Thermal Sprayed Aluminum and Inorganic Zinc Primer with Inert Multi-Polymeric Matrix are optimum protective coating system in severe conditions.