Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

Prediction Of The Mitigated Corrosion For Inhibitor Applications In Oil And Gas Operations

Picture for Prediction Of The Mitigated Corrosion For Inhibitor Applications In Oil And Gas Operations
Available for download
Product Number: 51321-16704-SG
Author: J. Sonke; Y. Zheng; J. Moloney
Publication Date: 2021
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

Over the past decades, several corrosion prediction models have been developed for Upstream Oil and
Gas process conditions. These models provide the unmitigated corrosion rates in typical sweet or sour
conditions. However, the practice of field operations is typically based on the mitigated corrosion rate.
Therefore, the predicted unmitigated corrosion rates cannot directly be used to understand real-life
situation unless the effect of mitigation is effectively considered. Currently, the mitigated corrosion rate
is typically quantified via a very simplified method (e.g. corrosion inhibitor availability).
Corrosion prediction is designed to look forward and, ideally, should also be part of corrosion and asset
integrity management. For this purpose, a robust analysis of the mitigation practices and methods is
essential. This paper provides an overview of aspects to be considered when predicting mitigated
corrosion rate for the case of continuous corrosion inhibitor (CI) injection as the mitigation barrier. It is
proposed to use a combination of models to calculate the mitigated corrosion rate in a practical and
reliable way. It is recognized that partitioning of the CI among different phases is a key aspect in
relation to the field application of inhibitors. Therefore, guidance is provided to incorporate this as part
of the corrosion mitigation and its prediction.

Over the past decades, several corrosion prediction models have been developed for Upstream Oil and
Gas process conditions. These models provide the unmitigated corrosion rates in typical sweet or sour
conditions. However, the practice of field operations is typically based on the mitigated corrosion rate.
Therefore, the predicted unmitigated corrosion rates cannot directly be used to understand real-life
situation unless the effect of mitigation is effectively considered. Currently, the mitigated corrosion rate
is typically quantified via a very simplified method (e.g. corrosion inhibitor availability).
Corrosion prediction is designed to look forward and, ideally, should also be part of corrosion and asset
integrity management. For this purpose, a robust analysis of the mitigation practices and methods is
essential. This paper provides an overview of aspects to be considered when predicting mitigated
corrosion rate for the case of continuous corrosion inhibitor (CI) injection as the mitigation barrier. It is
proposed to use a combination of models to calculate the mitigated corrosion rate in a practical and
reliable way. It is recognized that partitioning of the CI among different phases is a key aspect in
relation to the field application of inhibitors. Therefore, guidance is provided to incorporate this as part
of the corrosion mitigation and its prediction.

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for A Review Of Hydrogen Stress Cracking Of Nickel-Based Alloys For Oil And Gas Applications
Available for download

A Review Of Hydrogen Stress Cracking Of Nickel-Based Alloys For Oil And Gas Applications

Product Number: 51321-16705-SG
Author: Thierry Cassagne; Hervé Marchebois; Thiago Mesquita
Publication Date: 2021
$20.00
Picture for Hydrogen Stress Cracking Resistance Of High Strength Alloys For Subsea Fasteners
Available for download

Hydrogen Stress Cracking Resistance Of High Strength Alloys For Subsea Fasteners

Product Number: 51321-16709-SG
Author: Thierry Cassagne, Dominique Thierry
Publication Date: 2021
$20.00

Bolted connections for subsea flanges and other components must be reliable as they are often used for pressure containing components (subsea Christmas trees, connectors …). When possible, the primary choice for bolting is low-alloy steel with a limitation of actual yield strength (135 ksi) and a maximum hardness of 34 HRC to prevent HSC.
Picture for Sour Under-Deposit Corrosion With Different Iron Sulfides
Available for download

Sour Under-Deposit Corrosion With Different Iron Sulfides

Product Number: 51321-16703-SG
Author: J. Kvarekvål; M. Tjelta
Publication Date: 2021
$20.00
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support