Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.

During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.

Search
Filters
Close

Liquid Versus Fixed Bed H2S Scavengers, Working In Harmony Or Against Each Other

Product Number: 51321-16815-SG
Author: Sooi Kim Lim; Alyn jenkins; Kristina Barbuto; Michael Crawshaw; William Brundick; Michael Juncker
Publication Date: 2021
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

Natural gas sweetening extensively utilizes both liquid scavengers and fixed bed adsorbent technology. Typically, an operator uses one of these chemical treatment options for the selective removal of Hydrogen Sulfide in crude oil and natural gas processing. Few suppliers provide both liquid and fixed bed adsorbent and are therefore unable to look objectively an optimized natural gas sweetening solution using both technologies together.

In this paper, we discuss the advantages and disadvantageous of each natural gas sweetening technology. This review focuses on an overview of both liquid scavenger and fixed bed adsorbent, including a process description, chemistry, equipment required, footprint, method of monitoring performance, system maintenance, and the resulting economics.

A successful case study demonstrating hybrid system operation is included. This case study demonstrates how a hybrid system, using a liquid scavenger followed by a fixed bed adsorbent can be more effective in meeting customer's specific requirements. A hybrid system can improve control of both CAPEX and OPEX and provide flexible operation.

Natural gas sweetening extensively utilizes both liquid scavengers and fixed bed adsorbent technology. Typically, an operator uses one of these chemical treatment options for the selective removal of Hydrogen Sulfide in crude oil and natural gas processing. Few suppliers provide both liquid and fixed bed adsorbent and are therefore unable to look objectively an optimized natural gas sweetening solution using both technologies together.

In this paper, we discuss the advantages and disadvantageous of each natural gas sweetening technology. This review focuses on an overview of both liquid scavenger and fixed bed adsorbent, including a process description, chemistry, equipment required, footprint, method of monitoring performance, system maintenance, and the resulting economics.

A successful case study demonstrating hybrid system operation is included. This case study demonstrates how a hybrid system, using a liquid scavenger followed by a fixed bed adsorbent can be more effective in meeting customer's specific requirements. A hybrid system can improve control of both CAPEX and OPEX and provide flexible operation.

Also Purchased
Picture for H?S Control Via Downhole Injection of a New Non-scaling H?S Scavenger Chemistry
Available for download

51315-5578-H2S Control Via Downhole Injection of a New Non-scaling H?S Scavenger Chemistry

Product Number: 51315-5578-SG
ISBN: 5578 2015 CP
Author: Kevin Janak
Publication Date: 2015
$20.00
Picture for 10291 The Effect of Ammonium Bisulphite on Sulphide in Brine/H2S Solution
Available for download

10291 The Effect of Ammonium Bisulphite on Sulphide in Brine/H2S Solution

Product Number: 51300-10291-SG
ISBN: 10291 2010 CP
Author: Daley Lasebikan, Alfred Akisanya, Bill Deans, Donald Macphee and Lindsey Boyle
Publication Date: 2010
$20.00
Picture for 04360 Investigation of a Corrosion Failure in an
Available for download

04360 Investigation of a Corrosion Failure in an Offshore Gas Compression System: The Role of H2S Scavenger and Organic Acids

Product Number: 51300-04360-SG
ISBN: 04360 2004 CP
Author: Kim Rasmussen, Maersk Oil & Gas; Adrian Wright, Capcis Limited; Michael John Schofield; Henning Lund
$20.00