Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

Erosion Corrosion Phenomena In Oil And Gas Facilities: Evaluation And Monitoring

Picture for Erosion Corrosion Phenomena In Oil And Gas Facilities: Evaluation And Monitoring
Available for download

High flow velocity can have negative impact on the integrity of the oil and gas production equipment. This negative impact can manifest by the reduction of Corrosion Inhibitor (CI) efficiency: the higher the flow velocity, the lower the CI efficiency. The negative impact can also manifest by the occurrence of liquid erosion corrosion phenomena.

Product Number: 51322-17665-SG
Author: Raquel Araujo, Mioara Stroe, Kuate-Teku Rheingold, Igor Pipas, Francisco Mateus-Garcia, Laurent Dehays
Publication Date: 2022
Industries: Cathodic Protection , Corrosion Monitoring and Control , Coatings and Linings , Coatings
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

High flow velocity can have negative impact on the integrity of the oil and gas production equipment. This negative impact can influence the efficiency of Corrosion Inhibitor (CI). It is well established that the higher the flow velocity, the lower the CI efficiency. Another detrimental effect of flow velocity is the possible occurrence of erosion-corrosion phenomena, where the bare metal will be continuously exposed to the corrosive environment, and thus corroding much faster than in low flow velocity conditions. The C-factor, as derived from API RP 14E equation, is used as criteria to limit the flow velocity to avoid such severe phenomena. This criterion is dependent on fluid corrosiveness, efficiency of the inhibition and the presence of solid particles. The Company uses a software, an in-house developed tool, to predict and evaluate the risk of erosion-corrosion for different oil and gas production equipment. Typical parameters influencing the corrosiveness of the fluid (water phase composition, CO2 content in the associated gas, pressure, temperature), the production data (GOR, BSW) and the geometry of the equipment are considered when evaluate the likelihood of erosion-corrosion occurrence. Two case studies are presented, both concerning multiphase subsea production pipelines in service on our offshore assets. As per COMPANY strategy this equipment is periodically inspected via In Line Inspection (ILI) Technology, with the aim of assessing its status. The results of these inspections are analyzed from a corrosion management point of view. Considering real production data and operating conditions, the in-house software was used to evaluate the corrosiveness of the produced fluid and the occurrence of erosion-corrosion phenomena. The predicted corrosion rates are then compared with the ones measured by inspection tools (ILI & non-intrusive thickness monitoring). This analysis is used further on to re-define the corrosion mitigation program.

High flow velocity can have negative impact on the integrity of the oil and gas production equipment. This negative impact can influence the efficiency of Corrosion Inhibitor (CI). It is well established that the higher the flow velocity, the lower the CI efficiency. Another detrimental effect of flow velocity is the possible occurrence of erosion-corrosion phenomena, where the bare metal will be continuously exposed to the corrosive environment, and thus corroding much faster than in low flow velocity conditions. The C-factor, as derived from API RP 14E equation, is used as criteria to limit the flow velocity to avoid such severe phenomena. This criterion is dependent on fluid corrosiveness, efficiency of the inhibition and the presence of solid particles. The Company uses a software, an in-house developed tool, to predict and evaluate the risk of erosion-corrosion for different oil and gas production equipment. Typical parameters influencing the corrosiveness of the fluid (water phase composition, CO2 content in the associated gas, pressure, temperature), the production data (GOR, BSW) and the geometry of the equipment are considered when evaluate the likelihood of erosion-corrosion occurrence. Two case studies are presented, both concerning multiphase subsea production pipelines in service on our offshore assets. As per COMPANY strategy this equipment is periodically inspected via In Line Inspection (ILI) Technology, with the aim of assessing its status. The results of these inspections are analyzed from a corrosion management point of view. Considering real production data and operating conditions, the in-house software was used to evaluate the corrosiveness of the produced fluid and the occurrence of erosion-corrosion phenomena. The predicted corrosion rates are then compared with the ones measured by inspection tools (ILI & non-intrusive thickness monitoring). This analysis is used further on to re-define the corrosion mitigation program.

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for Improved Cathodic Protection Current Distribution for Above Ground Storage Tank Bottoms Due to Low Resistivity Vapor Corrosion Inhibitor Use
Available for download

Improved Cathodic Protection Current Distribution for Above Ground Storage Tank Bottoms Due to Low Resistivity Vapor Corrosion Inhibitor Use

Product Number: 51322-17666-SG
Author: Sujay Math
Publication Date: 2022
$20.00

In this paper, the CP current distribution with changing resistivities and the area of influence required to meet effective CP criteria, is studied. The results indicate that the tank pad electrolyte resistivity plays a significant role in achieving uniform CP current distribution. The paper also explores the use of Vapor Corrosion Inhibitor (VCI) and its effect on electrolyte resistivity and the resulting CP current distribution.
Picture for A Remote Monitoring System Featuring GPS Synchronized Instant-Off Potential And Line-Current Measurements
Available for download

A Remote Monitoring System Featuring GPS Synchronized Instant-Off Potential And Line-Current Measurements

Product Number: 51322-17635-SG
Author: Andreas Junker Olesen, Lars Vendelbo Nielsen
Publication Date: 2022
$20.00

There are several ways to validate the performance of a cathodic protection (CP) system for buried pipelines. Over the years, pipeline networks and their corrosion challenges have become increasingly complicated, not least due to the many sources of both AC and DC interference that affects CP operation. Also, the various measurement techniques that can be applied to test CP effectiveness has increased over the years. Finally, the sheer number of buried pipeline miles has been constantly increasing.
Picture for Comparing AC Study Techniques In Addressing AC Corrosion Risk
Available for download

Comparing AC Study Techniques In Addressing AC Corrosion Risk

Product Number: 51322-17735-SG
Author: Perry Ross
Publication Date: 2022
$20.00

AC interference studies have become increasingly popular in an industry where shared right of ways have increased and there has been a better understanding of how AC interacts between pipelines and powerlines that are collocated with each other. While modeling software for AC interference studies have been developed since the 1990s, advancement in AC interference processes have occurred as more has been learned over the years. When performing an AC interference study there are three steps that need to be completed: field data collection, modeling, and mitigation design. Within this paper, we can compare a project from ten years ago to a project from today to understand the developments that have been made over the course of time to improve the way we develop our mitigation designs.
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support