Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.

During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.

Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

11082 Guidelines When Conducting Hydrostatic Pressure Tests and Management of Extended Dwell Times Through Dry/Wet Lay-ups

Picture for 11082 Guidelines When Conducting Hydrostatic Pressure Tests and Management of Extended Dwell Times
Available for download

Observations and guidelines to conduct hydrostatic pressure tests of pipelines and/or process equipment.  Concerns for hydrostatic pressure tests relate to the water itself, including any suspended solids, dissolved oxygen, or any Sulfate Reducing Bacteria (SRB) or Acid Producing Bacteria (APB) present in the test water.

Product Number: 51300-11082-SG
ISBN: 11082 2011 CP
Author: Daniel E. Powell, Burkin Melancon and Robert H. Winters
Publication Date: 2011
Industries: Process Industries , Gas/Liquid Pipelines , Oil and Gas Production
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

This paper presents observations and guidelines associated with conducting hydrostatic pressure tests of pipelines and/or process equipment, such as vessels. The potential concerns for hydrostatic pressure tests relate to the water itself, including any suspended solids, dissolved oxygen, or any Sulfate Reducing Bacteria (SRB) or Acid Producing Bacteria (APB) that may be present in the test water. Recommendations of several major crude oil and natural gas producers, pipeline companies, chemical suppliers and service companies have been reviewed, including “best practices.” Hydrostatic pressure test water should be completely removed from the system within 28 days, including any small remnants of water from low spots or deadlegs. However, if the period of time following the introduction of the test water and the beginning of operations exceeds 28 days, then it would be appropriate for a “dry” or “wet” lay-up in order to preserve the integrity of the base metals and prevent internal corrosion. This paper presents general observations and recommendations related to “dry” and “wet” lay-ups, including filtration requirements and specific treatments for oxygen scavengers, biocides, and corrosion inhibitors.

Keywords: Hydrostatic, Pressure Test, biocide, glutaraldehyde, THPS, Sulfate Reducing Bacteria, SRB, corrosion inhibitor, oxygen scavenger, ammonium bisulfite, ABS, pickling, wet lay-up, dry lay-up, dwell time

This paper presents observations and guidelines associated with conducting hydrostatic pressure tests of pipelines and/or process equipment, such as vessels. The potential concerns for hydrostatic pressure tests relate to the water itself, including any suspended solids, dissolved oxygen, or any Sulfate Reducing Bacteria (SRB) or Acid Producing Bacteria (APB) that may be present in the test water. Recommendations of several major crude oil and natural gas producers, pipeline companies, chemical suppliers and service companies have been reviewed, including “best practices.” Hydrostatic pressure test water should be completely removed from the system within 28 days, including any small remnants of water from low spots or deadlegs. However, if the period of time following the introduction of the test water and the beginning of operations exceeds 28 days, then it would be appropriate for a “dry” or “wet” lay-up in order to preserve the integrity of the base metals and prevent internal corrosion. This paper presents general observations and recommendations related to “dry” and “wet” lay-ups, including filtration requirements and specific treatments for oxygen scavengers, biocides, and corrosion inhibitors.

Keywords: Hydrostatic, Pressure Test, biocide, glutaraldehyde, THPS, Sulfate Reducing Bacteria, SRB, corrosion inhibitor, oxygen scavenger, ammonium bisulfite, ABS, pickling, wet lay-up, dry lay-up, dwell time

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for 11032 New Development of a High Tg FBE Coating
Available for download

11032 New Development of a High Tg FBE Coating

Product Number: 51300-11032-SG
ISBN: 2011 11032 CP
Author: Byungsoo Moon, Byungkap Paek, Jinseok Lee, Hyunwoong Wang, Namho Lee
Publication Date: 2011
$20.00

Fusion Bonded Epoxy (FBE) is required to protect the pipes in higher temperatures. This paper reports evaluation methods for these high Tg FBE, and the performance differences between the high Tg FBE and general FBE.
Picture for 10002 Failure Analysis of Three Layer Polypropylene Pipeline Coatings
Available for download

10002 Failure Analysis of Three Layer Polypropylene Pipeline Coatings

Product Number: 51300-10002-SG
ISBN: 10002 2010 CP
Author: Ali Noor Moosavi, Benjamin T. A. Chang and Kamal Mohamed Morsi
Publication Date: 2010
$20.00

Three layer polypropylene (3LPP) pipeline coatings failed prematurely in the oilfields of Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). A failure investigation and analysis into this phenomenon was instigated. The coating disbondment has been found to be due to high residual stress concentration and adhesion loss.
Picture for 11120 Sulfur Corrosion Due To Oxygen Ingress
Available for download

11120 Sulfur Corrosion Due To Oxygen Ingress

Product Number: 51300-11120-SG
ISBN: 2011 11120 CP
Author: Joseph Boivin and Scott Oliphant
Publication Date: 2011
$20.00

 Case histories are presented where Oxygen ingress has led to Sulfur corrosion failures in pipelines and downhole equipment. 

 
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support