Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

Save 20% on select titles with code HIDDEN24 - Shop The Sale Now

51314-3909-Evaluating Nuclear Buried Piping Remediation Alternatives

Picture for Evaluating Nuclear Buried Piping Remediation Alternatives
Available for download
Product Number: 51314-3909-SG
ISBN: 3909 2014 CP
Author: Steve Biagiotti Jr. MSc, PE
Publication Date: 2014
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Effective management of buried piping begins with an understanding of the current condition of an asset through a progressive series of steps starting with cataloging known data about the design service and operational history through risk ranking and into prioritized inspections to establish a reasonable assurance of the current continued safe operating condition. For long term aging management a successful buried pipe program evaluates future corrosion degradation rates and establishes a frequency for reinispection combined with appropriate corrosion control measures. The cost of monitoring together with excavation and reinspection can become significant when projected 20 to 40 years in time.  Therefore it can be more cost effective to perform a life cycle assessment of critical buried piping systems combined with realistic construction cost estimates shortly after the first round of inspections in a buried pipe program to provide the buried pipe program owner and management with realistic cash flow projections associated with the impact of leaks and maintenance costs against replacement options to maximize the reliability and cost viability of the plant. This paper will outline a comprehensive approach to evaluating the long term cost benefits of corrosion control versus pipe replacement options.  
Effective management of buried piping begins with an understanding of the current condition of an asset through a progressive series of steps starting with cataloging known data about the design service and operational history through risk ranking and into prioritized inspections to establish a reasonable assurance of the current continued safe operating condition. For long term aging management a successful buried pipe program evaluates future corrosion degradation rates and establishes a frequency for reinispection combined with appropriate corrosion control measures. The cost of monitoring together with excavation and reinspection can become significant when projected 20 to 40 years in time.  Therefore it can be more cost effective to perform a life cycle assessment of critical buried piping systems combined with realistic construction cost estimates shortly after the first round of inspections in a buried pipe program to provide the buried pipe program owner and management with realistic cash flow projections associated with the impact of leaks and maintenance costs against replacement options to maximize the reliability and cost viability of the plant. This paper will outline a comprehensive approach to evaluating the long term cost benefits of corrosion control versus pipe replacement options.  
Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Activities Regarding Buried and Underground Piping at Nuclear Power
Available for download

51315-5511-US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Activities Regarding Buried and Underground Piping at Nuclear Power

Product Number: 51315-5511-SG
ISBN: 5511 2015 CP
Author: David Alley
Publication Date: 2015
$20.00
Picture for 11182 Cathodic Protection Design Considerations for Buried Nuclear Piping
Available for download

11182 Cathodic Protection Design Considerations for Buried Nuclear Piping

Product Number: 51300-11182-SG
ISBN: 11182 2011 CP
Author: Steven F. Daily
Publication Date: 2011
$20.00
Picture for Methods of Monitoring Reinforced Concrete Corrosion in Formulations for Nuclear Facilities
Available for download

Methods of Monitoring Reinforced Concrete Corrosion in Formulations for Nuclear Facilities

Product Number: 51317--9154-SG
ISBN: 9154 2017 CP
Author: Damián Vazquez
Publication Date: 2017
$20.00

Two concrete formulations, one of ordinary portland cement and one of pozzolanic portland cement, are compared by rebar corrosion criteria. Both formulations are candidates for nuclear applications whose durability requirement is higher than 300 years.
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support