Server maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, December 21st between 6am-10am CST.

During that time, parts of our website will be affected until maintenance is completed. Thank you for your patience.

Menu
Search
Filters
Close
Menu

Evaluating Corrosion under Protective Coatings for Steel in Marine Environments

Evaluating Corrosion under Protective Coatings for Steel in Marine Environments
Available for download

Protective organic coatings are the primary form of corrosion control for steel structures exposed in a marine environment. For more than fifty years, testing of coatings suitable for various service environments has relied substantially on exposure of coated steel panels of different configurations followed by evaluation via visual inspection. Exposure may include accelerated testing or natural environmental exposure in immersion or atmospheric conditions. 

Product Number: 51218-100-SG
Author: Patrick Cassidy, James A. Ellor
Publication Date: 2018
Industry: Coatings
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

 Protective organic coatings are the primary form of corrosion control for steel structures exposed in a marine environment. For more than fifty years, testing of coatings suitable for various service environments has relied substantially on exposure of coated steel panels of different configurations followed by evaluation via visual inspection. Exposure may include accelerated testing or natural environmental exposure in immersion or atmospheric conditions. Common visual inspection practices include semi-quantitative evaluation of the degree of rusting, degree of blistering, and extent of scribe creep (i.e., cutback). Coatings performing well in these evaluations versus specification standards are often deemed “acceptable.” Recent research suggests that common visual inspection protocols, while useful for judging aesthetic concerns, may not be sufficient in identifying the substrate corrosion control (barrier properties) provided by a coating. Destructive physical inspection for corrosion under protective coatings post-exposure suggests that significant metal loss may be occurring in the absence of a visual indication and that actual corrosion/material loss does not correlate with the visual inspection data. With a broader dataset of similar results, the data may suggest that the industry needs to reevaluate coating performance evaluation methods wherein the primary issue is substrate corrosion control as opposed to aesthetics.

 Protective organic coatings are the primary form of corrosion control for steel structures exposed in a marine environment. For more than fifty years, testing of coatings suitable for various service environments has relied substantially on exposure of coated steel panels of different configurations followed by evaluation via visual inspection. Exposure may include accelerated testing or natural environmental exposure in immersion or atmospheric conditions. Common visual inspection practices include semi-quantitative evaluation of the degree of rusting, degree of blistering, and extent of scribe creep (i.e., cutback). Coatings performing well in these evaluations versus specification standards are often deemed “acceptable.” Recent research suggests that common visual inspection protocols, while useful for judging aesthetic concerns, may not be sufficient in identifying the substrate corrosion control (barrier properties) provided by a coating. Destructive physical inspection for corrosion under protective coatings post-exposure suggests that significant metal loss may be occurring in the absence of a visual indication and that actual corrosion/material loss does not correlate with the visual inspection data. With a broader dataset of similar results, the data may suggest that the industry needs to reevaluate coating performance evaluation methods wherein the primary issue is substrate corrosion control as opposed to aesthetics.

Product tags
Also Purchased
Picture for Evaluating Corrosion Under Protective Coatings for Steel in Marine Environments
Available for download

Evaluating Corrosion Under Protective Coatings for Steel in Marine Environments

Product Number: 51317--9005-SG
ISBN: 9005 2017 CP
Author: James Ellor
Publication Date: 2017
$20.00

Destructive physical inspection for corrosion under protective coatings post-exposure suggests that significant metal loss may be occurring in the absence of a visual indication and that actual corrosion/material loss does not correlate with the visual inspection data.
Picture for 10305 316 Stainless Steel Instrument Tubing in Marine Applications
Available for download

10305 316 Stainless Steel Instrument Tubing in Marine Applications

Product Number: 51300-10305-SG
ISBN: 10305 2010 CP
Author: Ardjan Kopliku and Conchita Mendez
Publication Date: 2010
$20.00

Field experience was studied to identify the best solutions to Localized corrosion of 316 stainless steel instrument and chemical injection tubing in marine environment. Laboratory tests and exposure in marine environment of samples have been used to evaluate possible alternative materials and protective chemicals.
Picture for 01008 OFFSHORE RISK BASED CORROSION INTEGRITY
Available for download

01008 OFFSHORE RISK BASED CORROSION INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT A NEW METHODOLOGY

Product Number: 51300-01008-SG
ISBN: 01008 2001 CP
Author: Binder Singh, and Jim N. Britton
$20.00
Categories
Industry
Recently viewed
Popular tags
View all

Association for Materials Protection and Performance

© AMPP All Rights Reserved.
Membership Terms of Content Use
Contact Customer Support