Search
Filters
Close

Save 20% on select titles with code HIDDEN24 - Shop The Sale Now

Use of Modern Technologies to Solve an Ageing Scaling Problem

The Frøy field is in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea and is located in the Jurassic Sleipner and
Hugin formations at a depth of 2940 – 3176 m true vertical depth subsea. It is made up of a series of
reservoir units (RU), with the main units being RU3 to 5. The reservoir has a porosity of 15 – 23% and a
permeability of 15 – 1500 mD.

Product Number: 51323-19296-SG
Author: Andrew Fyfe; David Nichols; Caroline Simpson; Gordon Graham
Publication Date: 2023
$0.00
$20.00
$20.00

The impact of the presence of untreated sea water on the scaling risk has been considered using reservoir and scale prediction modelling. To ensure effective mitigation (if chemical inhibitors proved less than satisfactory) a range of alternative technologies were assessed in detailed laboratory studies. In particular, surface coatings were assessed to reduce scaling in wellbores and lower completion tubulars. Tests were conducted under conventional “coupon” type surface scaling approaches as well as large-scale “pilot rig” flow apparatus. The conclusion from this work was that a moderate to significant scaling challenge was expected despite the use of LSSW for future pressure support and even given moderate to extensive levels of in situ stripping as a result of the extended shut-in period. The laboratory results demonstrate that scaling could be mitigated by the use of conventional scale inhibitor chemistries. In addition, that coatings gave a marked reduction in scale deposition and ease of scale removal. However more significantly, in the presence of coatings, residual oil, and in the presence of certain types of scale inhibitor chemistries, a more considerable reduction in the amount of scale deposited on the coated pipe compared with the uncoated pipe, and considerably less adhesion strength, was observed.

The impact of the presence of untreated sea water on the scaling risk has been considered using reservoir and scale prediction modelling. To ensure effective mitigation (if chemical inhibitors proved less than satisfactory) a range of alternative technologies were assessed in detailed laboratory studies. In particular, surface coatings were assessed to reduce scaling in wellbores and lower completion tubulars. Tests were conducted under conventional “coupon” type surface scaling approaches as well as large-scale “pilot rig” flow apparatus. The conclusion from this work was that a moderate to significant scaling challenge was expected despite the use of LSSW for future pressure support and even given moderate to extensive levels of in situ stripping as a result of the extended shut-in period. The laboratory results demonstrate that scaling could be mitigated by the use of conventional scale inhibitor chemistries. In addition, that coatings gave a marked reduction in scale deposition and ease of scale removal. However more significantly, in the presence of coatings, residual oil, and in the presence of certain types of scale inhibitor chemistries, a more considerable reduction in the amount of scale deposited on the coated pipe compared with the uncoated pipe, and considerably less adhesion strength, was observed.