Search
Filters
Close

Individual Conference Papers

View as
Sort by
Display per page
Picture for Measuring the Localized Corrosion Due to Carbonic Acid
Available for download

Measuring the Localized Corrosion Due to Carbonic Acid

Product Number: 51319-12923-SG
Author: Omar Yepez
Publication Date: 2019
$20.00

The mechanism of carbonic acid corrosion is of a paramount importance for the oil industry. This is because production of crude is always accompanied by CO2 and water. Carbonic acid localized corrosion is by far more important than general corrosion. This is because you just need one tiny rupture in the pipe to have a failure which will need to be addressed and repaired. Methods to determine localized corrosion are very few. In one method the electrochemical potential of the metal specimen is increased with time until the material fails which is detected as a large oxidation current. In another a large constant oxidative potential is imposed on the metal coupon then its temperature is increased until a high current is observed. In both the nature of the surface at corrosion potential is not preserved. Electrochemical noise has come to address this problems because this method does not perturb the surface of the metal and all its measurements occurs at open circuit potential. However this non-perturbative method has little quantitative value and the interpretation of the data obtained is still very difficult. For instance the noise current cannot be integrated to know the extension of the damage. This is because one does not know to what electrode the noise belongs. In this paper the localized carbonic acid corrosion of a carbon steel at corrosion potential was measured. This was performed by pulsing at the corrosion potential and changing the temperature of the test. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy was also used in the same manner. In both methods the localized current was integrated and the localized damage was determined.Key words: Localized corrosion CO2 corrosion electrochemical methods.

Picture for Mechanical Characterization and Adherence of Iron Carbonate on an X65 Steel
Available for download

Mechanical Characterization and Adherence of Iron Carbonate on an X65 Steel

Product Number: 51319-13390-SG
Author: Claudia Prieto
Publication Date: 2019
$20.00

Formation of iron carbonate layers on mild steel is an important factor in CO2 corrosion as they provide a protective barrier that helps preserve pipeline integrity. However the protectiveness conferred by such layers can be compromised due to their mechanical removal; a phenomenon that has hitherto been unexplored. The main objective of this work was to evaluate the mechanical integrity of an iron carbonate layer grown on an X65 steel by nanoindentation and scratch test methods. Berkovich and Vickers-type indenters were used to determine the hardness of the iron carbonate layer and the metal. A scratch tester with a conical indenter 120° cone angle and 20 μm in diameter was used to determine the critical force to remove the iron carbonate layer. Nanoindentation results indicated that the hardness of the iron carbonate layer was 11.63 ± 3.50 GPa and the hardness of the steel was 2.40 ± 0.21 GPa. According to the failure map (hardness of the substrate vs. hardness of the layer) the failure mode of the iron carbonate on steel (whose hardness is 5 times higher than the substrate) is by chipping. In order to corroborate this postulate scratch testing was used to determine the minimal force to detect superficial removal and total delamination of the iron carbonate layer from the steel. The required forces were determined to be of the order of 40 mN and 400 mN respectively. The presence of chevron-type cracking patterns confirmed the cohesive failure of the layer at low applied forces while the chipping pattern at higher forces was indicative of the adhesive failure mode of the iron carbonate on the X65 steel. These results were further corroborated by profilometry and scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) analyses. Finally the shear stresses associated with the partial and total removal of iron carbonate were determined. The results indicating that the partial delamination and total delamination shear stresses required are of the order of 300 MPa and 2 GPa respectively.

Picture for Mechanical Properties of a Mackinawite Corrosion Product Layer
Available for download

Mechanical Properties of a Mackinawite Corrosion Product Layer

Product Number: 51319-13441-SG
Author: Ezechukwu Anyanwu
Publication Date: 2019
$20.00

To develop a holistic understanding of corrosion mechanisms in upstream oil and gas pipelines mechanical properties of the corrosion product layers as well as corrosion mechanisms need to be studied for better prediction of general and localized corrosion. Various ongoing research has focused on the topic of sour corrosion mechanisms while minimal attention has been paid to ascertaining the mechanical properties of the iron sulfide layers developed in these environments. The effects of fluid flow (i.e. erosion/corrosion wall shear stress) as well as the impact of different operations (i.e. wellbore cleaning wireline tools) on the internal pipeline wall may lead to a partial removal of corrosion product layers. This is an important topic since the mechanical damage of protective iron sulfide layers may lead to localized corrosion. To investigate the magnitude of stress required to damage iron sulfide layers up to the point of exposing the substrate well-defined iron sulfide layers were developed in a 4-liter glass cell and the mechanical properties of the layers such as hardness and adhesive strength were investigated using a mechanical tester. To develop the iron sulfide layer UNSG10180 carbon steel specimens were exposed to a 1 wt.% NaCl solution at pH of 6.0 well purged with a 10 mol.% H2S/N2 mixture. Fes layers were developed at two solution temperatures 30⁰C and 80⁰C and the hardness and interfacial shear strength of the layers formed after 1 day and 3 days were investigated. The morphological characteristics of the FeS layers under investigation were examined by conducting an SEM and cross-sectional analysis. XRD analysis confirmed mackinawite as the phase of the iron sulfide layer. While the interfacial shear strength of this FeS layer was found to be 5 magnitudes higher than the maximum flow related shear stress the integrity may be compromised if these layers are subjected to other mechanical impacts that may occur during production.