In the oil and gas industry, slug flow is commonly encountered and one of the most
erosive flow regimes when sand is entrained. The design of oil and gas production equipment
requires a reliable erosion prediction tool. Chen et al.1 proposed an approach for estimating
erosion rate in slug flows. It is a combination of mechanistic analysis and computational fluid
dynamics (CFD). Shirazi et al.2and McLaury et al.3 presented a method based on some onedimensional mechanistic models (hence called 1-D method) to predict erosion rate. This
method is successful in predicting erosion caused by relatively large sand (>50 microns) but
dramatically under-predicts for very small sand (~20 microns). The current authors presented
an improved method by introducing two-dimensional mechanistic models (hence called 2-D
method)4. It has been shown that for gas/solid or liquid/solid flows, the 2-D method performs
very well in predicting erosion for both large and small sand. This method is being extended for
handling gas/liquid/solid flows. This paper explains its application in slug flows. Results from
both 1-D and 2-D methods are compared with experimental data. It is shown that overall, the
2-D method performs much better then the 1-D method.
Keywords: Sand Erosion, Particle Tracking, Erosion Modeling, Slug Flow