Operators of pipelines and buried plant piping are often faced with the challenge of prioritizing
locations for assessment and selecting defensible intervals for reassessment. Technical staff that are
responsible for corrosion mitigation recognize that understanding the effect of the soil on buried
structures is a critical component in developing a representative picture of the external corrosion
potential of buried structures. However, it is not always apparent how to use soil analysis data
effectively in buried piping programs or how to integrate pipe polarization data in establishing
reinspection intervals.
This paper addresses how soil analyses and related corrosion rate modeling can be integrated with
indirect inspections (i.e., above ground surveys) data so that locations can be prioritized for further
examination and assessment, and how the results of the modeling can be used as a substitute for
default corrosion rates when setting reinspection intervals. The soil corrosiveness model developed for
this purpose was derived from empirical data relating twenty-two soil and cathodic protection
polarization attributes to long term corrosion pitting rates on buried steel pipe. We present a sampling
approach that has proven effective in gathering information useful in corrosion evaluations, and we
include discussion of the factors to consider when selecting locations for sampling and the soil sample
collection and analysis process itself. Finally we describe the integration of the soil data with cathodic
protection data to 1) rank the severity of the likely corrosion at each location and 2) provide quantitative
estimates of the corrosion rate at each location.
Keywords: soil, corrosion, modeling, integration, cathodic protection